Liquid Foundations With Silicone
Note: This page contains affiliate links, which means that Living Clean in a Dirty World may receive a commission if readers click on these links and then purchase products. Living Clean in a Dirty World also may accept product review samples but receives no other compensation from companies mentioned on this website.
October 1, 2022
By Lisa Petrison
Although silicone is a synthetic ingredient, it is not one that tends to be irritating to the skin.
Rather, the main problem with silicone in foundation seems to be that it can create a very effective (and in some cases waterproof) shield on the face that can trap oil, dirt, sweat, dead skin cells, bacteria, fungi and other debris – with the resulting muck causing irritation to the skin and making breakouts more likely.
Silicones – perhaps especially cyclic silicones such as cyclopentasiloxane – also are said to be bad for the environment.
Despite these downsides, it’s my experience that silicone-based foundations often look especially nice on skin that has wrinkles or other textural issues and that they can be very easy to apply.
While wearing this kind of foundation regularly probably is not optimal for anyone’s skin quality, I think more occasional use may not be all that damaging to the skin and certainly may be helpful in achieving a pretty look with minimal effort.
Wearing the product for a limited amount of time and then removing it thoroughly (which can be easier said than done with some of these waterproof formulas) does seem important though.
While most silicone-based foundation formulas also include other problematic ingredients, some look pretty clean to me.
I still don’t wear them very often, but a few have worked well for me on those occasions when I do wear them.
TOP PICKS
♣ Living Clean Superstars:
Beautycounter Skin Twin Featherweight Foundation ($50)
Glossier Perfecting Skin Tint ($26)
Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Foundation ($45)
Ilia True Skin Serum Foundation ($54)
Lisa Eldridge The Foundation ($61)
♦ Additional Possibilities:
Aveda Inner Light Mineral Tinted Moisturizer ($35)
Chantecaille Future Skin ($82)
Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin ($46)
MAC Studio Radiance Face & Body ($39)
Mineral Fusion Liquid Foundation ($33)
Tarte Sea Hydroflex Serum Foundation ($39)
♦ Not Yet Rated:
Fenty Eaze Drop Blurring Skin Tint ($32)
Neutrogena Sensitive Skin Serum Foundation ($15)
♠ Trash Can:
Armani Luminous Silk Foundation ($65)
♥ Lisa’s Choice:
√ Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Foundation ($45)
Notes:
1) Living Clean Superstars – Products with high scores on both Performance Rating (5) as well as Ingredients Rating (4/5). + Clean Pick (Ingredients Rating = 5).
2) Lisa’s Choice – Products that I would purchase for my own personal use. √ Lisa’s Favorite
Aveda Inner Light Mineral Tinted Moisturizer – $35
Overall Rating: 
(4 / 5)
Performance Rating: (4 / 5)
Ingredients Rating: (4 / 5)
Lisa Irritation Level: None
Processed Fragrance: Natural Fragrance
Silicone Level: Moderate
Coverage Level: Light/Medium
The description for this product on the Aveda website reads, “Infused with 100% mineral derived pigments and nourishing plant emollients, our Inner Light Mineral Tinted Moisture instantly increases radiance, delivers moisture upon application and provides a smooth, even complexion for flawless radiance.”
This product used to have sunscreen in it, but a few years ago the company removed the SPF without changing the product name and many people wrote negative reviews of the product on the company website as a result.
I have tried both versions and think that the one without the sunscreen is a little better in terms of wearability and appearance.
However, it still seems to make me look worse as a result of emphasizing my wrinkles and also provides little coverage of problem areas.
The product is listed as containing some natural fragrance as well as PEG-100 stearate.
I don’t feel like it has much of a smell and also do not feel that it has irritated my skin.
Size: 1.7 oz.
Aveda Rating: 3.9 Stars (158 reviews)
Credo Clean: No
Clean at Sephora: No
Drunk Elephant Clean: No
EU Compliant: Meets Criteria
EWG Ingredient Rating: 7 (red)
EWG Problem Ingredients: PEG-100 stearate (3), Natural fragrance (8), Linalool (3), Titanium dioxide (3). (Also contains Phenyl Trimethicone.)
Fragrance Ingredients: Natural fragrance
All Ingredients: Water, Tricaprylyl Citrate, Phenyl Trimethicone, Jojoba Esters, Hydrogenated Lecithin, Glyceryl Stearate, PEG-100 Stearate, Glycerin, Magnesium Aluminum Silicate, Cetyl Alcohol, Glyceryl Caprylate, Capryloyl Glycine, Polygonum Cuspidatum Root Extract, Tourmaline, Decyl Glucoside, Sodium Lauroyl Lactylate, Dipotassium Glycyrrhizate, Xanthan Gum, Natural Fragrance, Linalool, Aluminum Hydroxide, Disodium Coco-Glucoside Citrate, Sodium Gluconate, Citric Acid, Sorbic Acid. May Contain: Titanium Dioxide, Iron Oxides, Mica.
Beautycounter Skin Twin Foundation – $50
♣ Living Clean Superstar
Overall Rating: 
(5 / 5)
Performance Rating: (5 / 5)
Ingredients Rating: (4 / 5)
Lisa Irritation Level: None
Processed Fragrance: None
Silicone Level: Medium
Coverage Level: Light/Medium
The description of this product on the Beautycounter website reads, “Breathable, buildable coverage with hyaluronic acid to visibly plump the skin. With 27 buildable shades, this weightless, long wearing, natural-looking foundation feels like a second skin. Our skin-loving formula delivers all-day hydration while hyaluronic acid helps retain essential moisture for a visibly plump, even appearance from first use—and smoother, healthier-looking skin with each application.”
Personally, I really like the way that my skin looks in this foundation. The finish is natural-looking but also refined, and the wrinkles on my face do not seem to look worse than when I am not wearing any foundation.
Quite a bit of coverage can be obtained with this foundation by putting thin layers onto the skin.
Although the product seems to contain a goodly amount of silicone, I agree with the product description that it is at least a little breathable.
I don’t feel that it has irritated my skin at all and actually does seem like it might be a little good for my skin.
Of the silicone-based products that I have tried so far, this is one of the ones that I like the most.
I might buy it again if I felt that I needed more coverage than I do now.
I have Shade 240 (“light with warm, neutral undertones”) and feel that it has been a good match for my skin.
Size: 1 oz.
Beautycounter Rating: 4.8 Stars (3635 reviews)
Credo Clean: Meets Criteria
Clean at Sephora: Meets Criteria
Drunk Elephant Clean: No
EU Compliant: Meets Criteria
EWG Product Rating: EWG Verified
EWG Ingredient Rating: 4 (yellow)
EWG Problem Ingredients: Dimethicone (3), Sodium benzoate (3), Titanium dioxide (3). (Also contains Trimethylsiloxysilicate, Dimethicone/vinyl dimethicone crosspolymer, Triethoxycaprylylsilane.)
Fragrance Ingredients: None
All Ingredients: Water, Coco-Caprylate, Isododecane, Trimethylsiloxysilicate, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Isostearic Acid, Polyglyceryl-4 Diisostearate/Polyhydroxystearate/Sebacate, Isoeicosane, Propanediol, Jojoba Esters, Glycerin, Magnesium Sulfate, Beeswax, Dimethicone, Gluconolactone, Calcium Gluconate, Sodium Hyaluronate, Tocopherol, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Isopropyl Myristate, Ethylhexyl Palmitate, Polyglyceryl-3 Polyricinoleate, Polyhydroxystearic Acid, Lecithin, Sodium Benzoate, Hydrogenated Castor Oil, Sodium Chloride, Titanium Dioxide, Iron Oxides.
Chantecaille Future Skin – $82
Overall Rating: (4 / 5)
Performance Rating: (5 / 5)
Ingredients Rating: 
(3 / 5)
Lisa Irritation Level: None
Processed Fragrance: None
Silicone Level: High
Coverage Level: Medium/Full
The description of this product reads, “An innovative oil-free gel foundation with a refreshing, lightweight texture and a unique formula with 60% water. Future Skin transfers moisture into the skin without the use of oil as an emulsifier. Made with reflective circular pigments that provide adjustable coverage (medium-to-full) and ease the appearance of flaws, it’s also loaded with natural botanicals including aloe, chamomile and arnica that calm irritation and soothe sensitive skin. Rosemary, green tea and rice bran help prevent environmentally caused oxidation. Crafted in Japan.”
Although this expensive foundation contains some ingredients that made me concerned that it would not be a good match for my skin, I have done fine with it in terms of lack of irritation.
I think that it looks very pretty on my face without emphasizing my wrinkles, with a natural finish that is only slightly dewy-looking.
Although the coverage level is listed as medium/full, I feel like I have been able to get a lighter coverage just by spreading the product around with my fingers.
It does seem to be pretty buildable for those who want more coverage, though.
The product contains several different kinds of silicone and thus is not something that I personally would want to use on a regular basis.
I do think that it looks very pretty on me and that it is a nice product to wear on occasion though.
The product does contain several ingredients that are on Credo’s “dirty list,” including cyclopentasiloxane, PEG-400 and talc.
The preservatives phenoxyethanol and chlorphenesin also are used.
I hope that these preservatives at least will help the product to last for a long time, since it was expensive and I have only been using it occasionally.
I have the shade Camomile (“light with golden undertones”) in this product and feel that it has been okay for me.
Size: 1 oz.
Chantecaille Rating: 4.6 Stars (202 reviews)
Credo Clean: No
Clean at Sephora: No
Drunk Elephant Clean: No
EU Compliant: Meets Criteria
EWG Ingredient Rating: 6 (yellow)
EWG Problem Ingredients: Cyclopentasiloxane (3), Titanium dioxide (3), Cetyl PEG/PPG-10/1 Dimethicone (3), Dimethicone (3), PEG-400 (3), Phenoxyethanol (4), Chlorphenesin (3), Aloe vera (3), Talc (5). (Also contains Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Alcohol.)
Fragrance Ingredients: Rosemary leaf extract, Arnica montana flower extract, Chamomilla recutite flower extract
All Ingredients: Water, Cyclopentasiloxane, Titanium Dioxide, Cetyl PEG/PPG-10/1 Dimethicone, Pentylene Glycol, Dimethicone, Butylene Glycol, PEG-400, Sodium Chloride, Silica Dimethyl Silylate, Phenoxyethanol, Glycerin, Aluminum Hydroxide, Mica, Dimethicone/vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Chlorphenesin, Stearic Acid, Alcohol, Laminaria Saccharina Extract, Camellia Sinesis Leaf Extract, Rosemary Leaf Extract, Rice Bran Extract, Arnica Montana Flower Extract, Chamomilla Recutita Flower Extract, Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Extract, Natto Gum, Talc, Iron Oxides
Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin – $46
Overall Rating: (3 / 5)
Performance Rating: 
(2 / 5)
Ingredients Rating: (4 / 5)
Lisa Irritation Level: Mild
Processed Fragrance: Rose Oil
Silicone Level: High
Coverage Level: Medium
The description of this product on the Charlotte Tilbury website reads, “This medium coverage, hydrating foundation has been expertly formulated with skincare ingredients to combine instant glow and buildable coverage with long-term skincare benefits. With brightening Rose Complex and hydrating hyaluronic acid to improve the look of skin with each wear, my Beautiful Skin Foundation is the secret to your best, healthy looking skin day, every day!”
The product contains several different forms of silicone, with the only other ingredient listed as being of obvious concern being rose essential oil.
I received a sample of this and so gave it a try.
While the product went on thin and smoothly, with an attractive and natural-looking soft matte finish, I felt that the formula emphasized the texture of my skin (including my wrinkles) quite a lot.
The website uses photos of younger models with good skin, with the comment for each one of “Beautiful Before. Beautiful After.” And I would guess that that indeed, for those particular people, this foundation might help to enhance their attractiveness by adding a soft finish.
Based on my experience with it, this foundation seems less suited for those who are older or who have textural issues to their skin.
The product also irritated my face to a noticeable extent, with itching occurring for a couple of hours until I took it off. Whether the irritation was just due to the rose oil or to something else, I’m not sure.
Perhaps at some point I will try the foundation again over primer, to see if that helps my skin to tolerate the product better.
I’m not that motivated to spend money to do that since this foundation does not look very good on me, though.
Size: 1 oz.
Sephora Rating: 3.9 Stars (869 reviews)
Credo Clean: No
Clean at Sephora: No
Drunk Elephant Clean: No
EU Compliant: Meets Criteria
EWG Ingredient Rating: 3 (yellow)
EWG Problem Ingredients: Dimethicone (3), Cetyl PEG/PPG-10/1 Dimethicone (3), Tocopheryl acetate (3), Rosa damascena flower oil (3), Titanium dioxide (3). (Also contains Trimethylsiloxysilicate, Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Triethoxycaprylylsilane)
Fragrance Ingredients: Apple fruit water, Coconut Fruit Extract, Rosa Damascena Flower Oil, Rosa Damascena Flower Water
All Ingredients: Water, Apple Fruit Water, Dimethicone, Octyldodecyl Stearoyl Stearate, Cetyl PEG/PPG-10/1 Dimethicone, Mica, Hydrogenated Ethylhexyl Olivate, Hydrogenated Polyisobutene, Propanediol, Glycerin, Trimethylsiloxysilicate, Polyglyceryl-4 Isostearate, Sodium Chloride, Lauroyl Lysine, Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Disteardimonium Hectorite, Sodium Dehydroacetate, Hydrogenated Olive Oil Unsaponifiables, Caprylyl Glycol, 1,2-Hexanediol, Sodium Gluconate, Tocopheryl Acetate, Maltodextrin, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Aluminum Hydroxide, Bixa Orellana Seed Extract, Pentylene Glycol, Butylene Glycol, Cassia Angustifolia Seed Polysaccharide, Sodium Hyaluronate, Coconut Fruit Extract, Rosa Damascena Flower Oil, Rosa Damascena Flower Water, Pentaerythrityl Tetra-Di-T-Butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate. May Contain: Titanium Dioxide, Iron Oxides
Fenty Eaze Drop Blurring Skin Tint – $32
Performance Rating: Not Yet Rated
Ingredients Rating: (3 / 5)
Processed Fragrance: None
Silicone Level: High
Coverage Level: Light/Medium
The description of this product on the Fenty website reads, “The blur is real. Rihanna wanted to create a light coverage, easy-to-apply, flexible skin tint that instantly evens out your complexion and give a flattering blurred effect. Eaze Drop, with hydrating QuickBlur complex, is perfect for a no-makeup makeup look, or for when you want to look effortlessly put together. In 25 adaptable shade options for all. Instant, blurring skin tint in 25 flexible shades. Buildable light to medium longwear coverage. With QuickBlur Complex for a hydrating, diffused effect. Smooth texture that layers well with primer and skincare. Applies well with fingers or brush. Humidity-, sweat-, and transfer-resistant formula.”
The product is not listed as Clean at Sephora, apparently because of the use of talc in it.
I obtained a small sample of this product and so tried it out on half of my face. While I don’t feel that I have had enough experience with the product to give it a rating, I felt that it was okay on my skin and that it looked nice without drawing much attention to texture issues.
I would like to experiment with it more to see how I do with it.
Size: 1.08 oz.
Sephora Rating: 4.0 Stars (1322 reviews)
Credo Clean: No
Clean at Sephora: No
Drunk Elephant Clean: No
EU Compliant: Unclear
EWG Ingredient Rating: 6 (yellow)
EWG Problem Ingredients: Dimethicone (3), Talc (5), PEG-10 dimethicone (3), Bis-PEG/PPG-14/14-dimethicone (3), Phenoxyethanol (4), Urea (3), Benzoic acid (3), Glyceryl polyacrylate (3), Titanium dioxide (3)
Fragrance Ingredients: None
All Ingredients: Water, Dimethicone, Dicaprylyl Carbonate, Talc, Isostearyl Neopentanoate, PEG-10 Dimethicone, Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Glycerin, Trimethylsiloxysilicate, Isododecane, Bis-PEG/PPG-14/14 Dimethicone, Phenoxyethanol, Sodium Chloride, Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Magnesium Sulfate, Hydrogen Dimethicone, Sodium Dehydroacetate, Trehalose, Urea, Potassium Sorbate, Silica, Disteardimonium Hectorite, Aluminum Hydroxide, Benzoic Acid, Sodium Hyaluronate, C24-28 Alkyl Methicone, Pentylene Glycol, Serine, Dehydroacetic Acid, Propylene Carbonate, Ethylhexylglycerin, Algin, Caprylyl Glycol, Disodium Phosphate, Glyceryl Polyacrylate, Pullulan, Tocopherol, Potassium Phosphate, Iron Oxides, Titanium Dioxide.
Glossier Perfecting Skin Tint – $26
♣ Living Clean Superstar
Overall Rating: (5 / 5)
Performance Rating: (5 / 5)
Ingredients Rating: (4 / 5)
Lisa Irritation Level: None
Processed Fragrance: None
Silicone Level: High
Coverage Level: Light
The description of this product on the Glossier website reads, “In the land between bare skin and makeup makeup exists the imperceptible wash of color that is Perfecting Skin Tint. Breathable, ultra-thin formula evens out skin’s appearance for a smooth, dewy finish. Diamond Powder gives a brightening, soft-focus effect and minimizes the appearance of pores, while Glycerin moisturizes skin. Comes in 12 super sheer, adaptable shades that won’t hide your freckles, cake your pores, or cover you up.”
Although the Glossier brand seems to be targeted almost solely toward people under age 40, by far the most popular review of this foundation was written by an older woman extolling the virtues of it for her own skin.
She writes: ” I’m 70 and yes I know, out of Glossier’s regular demographic. I have tried so many foundations and have never been able to find a good match and a good texture. As you get older especially you do not want that heavy look. It just emphasizes the lines and wrinkles. At the same this it is nice to have something that evens you out and protects your skin….I used the pictures, found someone with a similar complexion to mine and just went for it. I was amazed to find the match was perfect. After application it seemed ok, walked away for a few minutes then looked again, my skin just looked good. This is far and away the best I’ve ever used and very reasonably priced.”
I agree with the reviewer that this foundation looks better on my skin than many of the other products that I have tried.
It goes on smoothly and easily, creating a natural-looking blurring effect that does not seem to emphasize my wrinkles or other textural issues.
I don’t feel that the product has irritated my skin at all.
Although the coverage level is light, I do think that my skin looks a little better when I am wearing it.
The finish is primarily matte, but with a soft sheen that looks basically just like lightly moisturized skin.
Although it contains several different kinds of silicone, it seems fairly breathable and does not feel uncomfortable on my skin even when it is hot outside.
The use of the cyclic silicones cyclopentasiloxane and cyclohexasiloxane would prevent the product from being sold by Credo, and it also contains chlorphenesin as a preservative.
I have G9 (“a warm medium shade”). It is a little darker than my skin but has seemed to work well for me, especially during the summer months.
Size: 1 oz.
Glossier Rating: 4.2 Stars (2099 reviews)
Credo Clean: No
Clean at Sephora: Unclear
Drunk Elephant Clean: No
EU Compliant: Meets Criteria
Think Dirty Rating: 2 (green)
EWG Product Rating: 2 (green)
EWG Ingredient Rating: 3 (yellow)
EWG Problem Ingredients: Cyclopentasiloxane (3), PEG-10 dimethicone (3), Dimethicone (3), Chlorphenesin (3), Titanium dioxide (3). (Also contains Cyclohexasiloxane, Polymethylsilsesquioxane, Alcohol, Triethocaprylysilane, Corn oil.)
Fragrance Ingredients: None
All Ingredients: Water, Cyclopentasiloxane, Cyclohexasiloxane, Dimer Dilinoleyl Dimer Dilinoleate, PEG-10 Dimethicone, Glycerin, Polymethylsilsesquioxane, Alcohol, Dimethicone, Mica, Caprylyl Glycol, Sodium Chloride, Disteardimonium Hectorite, Chlorphenesin, Propylene Carbonate, Boron Nitride, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Castor Seed Oil, Corn Oil, Diamond Powder, Quercus Suber Bark Extract. May Contain: Titanium Dioxide, Iron Oxides
Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Foundation – $45
♥ Lisa’s Choice
♣ Living Clean Superstar
Overall Rating: (5 / 5)
Performance Rating: (5 / 5)
Ingredients Rating: (4 / 5)
Lisa Irritation Level: None
Processed Fragrance: None
Silicone Level: High
Coverage Level: Medium
The description of this product reads, “A medium buildable coverage, high-performance, weightless, clean foundation infused with our proprietary fermented arnica that helps reduce redness, helps even skin tone and protects from environmental stress. Suitable for all skin types including sensitive and acne-prone. HausTech Powered with 20+ skincare ingredients including our patent-pending Fermented Arnica. Finally, a clean foundation for makeup lovers. Infused with 20+ skincare ingredients, this proprietary formula delivers ultra comfortable, longwear performance without compromising your skin. Its weightless, serum-like texture seamlessly blurs and smooths for a natural, luminous finish that wears all day. No slipping or caking. Foundation never felt (or looked) so good. Using the science of color theory, we obsessively formulated the perfect spectrum of 51 shades across 6 families based on your skin’s depth and undertones.”
This product (introduced by Haus Labs in Summer 2022) is available in a remarkable 51 shades.
It contains a variety of silicones, though none of these are the cyclic silicones that Credo believes to be especially concerning.
I tried the product out on a visit to Sephora store.
Based on that one experience, I really like this product.
It provided some coverage while still looking like I was not wearing any foundation at all.
My skin seemed to like this foundation quite a lot and did not display any signs of being irritated by it.
Despite the use of all the silicone in it, I feel that this foundation felt good on my skin even when I was sweating a bit as a result of exercise.
I didn’t feel that I had any problems removing it as I have with some products.
One important thing to know about this foundation is that they are using a similar shade system to MAC, where pink shades are classified as “warm” and yellow shades are classified as “cool.”
I tried out a number of shades in the Sephora store and concluded that the best one for me was Shade 110 Light Neutral (“very light with balanced undertones”). This was a bit of a surprise since I feel that my skin usually leans a bit yellow.
My experience suggests that it may be highly preferable to visit a Sephora store to try out the foundation in order to choose the right shade.
Based on my one experience with this foundation, I think that it may be my favorite among all the ones containing silicone that I have tried.
I would like to get a full bottle of it to try it out some more under different conditions to see if it turns out to be as good as I think it is.
Size: 1 oz.
Sephora Rating: 4.3 Stars (195 reviews)
Credo Clean: Meets Criteria
Clean at Sephora: Yes
Drunk Elephant Clean: No
EU Compliant: Meets Criteria
EWG Ingredient Rating: 4 (yellow)
EWG Problem Ingredients: C13-15 Alkane (3), Pseudozyma Epicola/Apricot Kernel Oil/Olive Fruit Oil/Sweet Almond Oil/Sunflower Seed Oil/Licorice Root Extract Ferment Extract Filtrate (4), Licorice Root Extract (4), Titanium Dioxide (3). (Also contains Diphenylsiloxy Phenyl Trimethicone, Phenyl Trimethicone, Caprylyl Methicone, Trimethylsiloxysilicate, Methyl Trimethicone, Lauryl Polyglyceryl-3 Polydimethylsiloxyethyl Dimethicone, Polyglyceryl-3 Polydimethylsiloxyethyl Dimethicone, Alcohol Denat., Acrylates/Polytrimethyl Siloxymethacrylate Copolymer, Polymethylsilsesquioxane, Polypropylsilsesquioxane, Acrylates/Dimethicone Copolymer, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer.)
Fragrance Ingredients: None
All Ingredients: Water, Diphenylsiloxy Phenyl Trimethicone, Phenyl Trimethicone, Caprylyl Methicone, Trimethylsiloxysilicate, Propylene Glycol Dibenzoate, Isododecane, Glycerin, Butylene Glycol, Methyl Trimethicone, Lauryl Polyglyceryl-3 Polydimethylsiloxyethyl Dimethicone, C13-15 Alkane, Polyglyceryl-3 Polydimethylsiloxyethyl Dimethicone, Alcohol Denat., Acrylates/Polytrimethyl Siloxymethacrylate Copolymer, Polymethylsilsesquioxane, Sorbitan Sesquioleate, Disteardimonium Hectorite, 1,2-Hexanediol, Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-10, Arnica Montana Flower Extract**, Hydrolyzed Hyaluronic Acid, Squalane, Pseudozyma Epicola/Camellia Sinensis Seed Oil Ferment Extract Filtrate, Pseudozyma Epicola/Apricot Kernel Oil/Olive Fruit Oil/Sweet Almond Oil/Sunflower Seed Oil/Licorice Root Extract Ferment Extract Filtrate, Pseudozyma Epicola/Apricot Kernel Oil/Olive Fruit Oil/Sunflower Seed Oil/Sweet Almond Oil/(Angelica Gigas/Lithospermum Erythrorhizon) Root, Tomato Fruit Extract, Dunaliella Salina Extract, Hedychium Coronarium Root Extract, Tocopherol, Althaea Rosea Flower Extract, Dandelion Extract, Perilla Ocymoides Leaf Extract, Panax Notoginseng Extract, Licorice Root Extract, Matricaria Extract, Centella Asiatica Extract, Pseudozyma Epicola/Sunflower Seed Oil Ferment Extract Filtrate, Caprylyl Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Magnesium Sulfate, Polypropylsilsesquioxane, Acrylates/Dimethicone Copolymer, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Aluminum Hydroxide, Titanium Dioxide, Iron Oxides. **Fermented.
Ilia True Skin Serum Foundation – $54
♣ Living Clean Superstar
Overall Rating: (5 / 5)
Performance Rating: (5 / 5)
Ingredients Rating: (4 / 5)
Lisa Irritation Level: None
Processed Fragrance: None
Silicone Level: Low
Coverage Level: Medium
This foundation is described on the Ilia website as “a weightless, medium-coverage foundation with a natural finish. This silky, breathable formula melts in and moves with you, seamlessly blending and blurring for skin that looks like skin. Potent skincare actives Niacinamide and Allantoin visibly improve skin with every wear, minimizing the look of pores, lines, redness, and uneven tone instantly and over time. Skin is left looking real and radiant—like you, just more polished.”
Although this product contains some dimethicone (silicone), it is listed as the eighth ingredient. This product thus does not seem to be nearly as silicone-heavy as many of the others listed on this page.
Perhaps because of this, I found this product to emphasize my wrinkles somewhat more than the Beautycounter Skin Twin, which seems to be otherwise quite similar.
The other obvious comparison products that I have tried are the Nars Light Reflecting Foundation and the Exa High Fidelity Foundation. These products do not contain any silicones and are listed on the Liquid Foundations page.
I think that this Ilia product looks better on my skin than either of those do, though perhaps it is just the small amount of silicone that makes the difference.
In any case, other than its tendency to make my wrinkles look somewhat worse, the Ilia True Skin foundation seems to be a nice product, providing a substantial amount of coverage, a moderate level of hydration, and a pretty finish.
If I wanted more coverage on a regular basis, this might be a good choice.
It is available in 30 shades. I have Malokai SF2.5 (“light with warm undertones”) and think that it is a pretty good match for my summer skin.
Size: 1 oz.
Sephora Rating: 4.6 Stars (218 reviews)
Credo Clean: Yes
Clean at Sephora: Yes
Drunk Elephant Clean: No
Think Dirty Rating: 3 (green)
EU Compliant: Meets Criteria
EWG Product Rating: 4 (yellow)
EWG Ingredient Rating: 4 (yellow)
EWG Problem Ingredients: Dimethicone (3), Sodium benzoate (3), Titanium dioxide (3). (Also contains Caprylyl Methicone, Triethoxycaprylylsilane.)
Fragrance Ingredients: Jasmine flower/leaf extract
All Ingredients: Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice, Coconut Alkanes, Caprylyl Methicone, Polyglyceryl-6 Polyricinoleate, Cetearyl Isononanoate, Polyglyceryl-2 Isostearate, Boron Nitride, Dimethicone, Disteardimonium Hectorite, Niacinamide, Rice Hull Powder, Gluconolactone, Sodium Chloride, Isopentyldiol, Glycerin, Coco-Caprylate/Caprate, Allantoin, Sodium Benzoate, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Jojoba Seed Oil, Sclerocarya Birrea Seed Oil, Squalane, Tocopherol, Pentylene Glycol, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Mastic Gum, Hydrogenated Lecithin, Calcium Gluconate, Ethylhexylglycerin, Jasmine Flower/Leaf Extract, Phenethyl Alcohol, Bisabolol. May Contain: Titanium Dioxide, Iron Oxides.
Lisa Eldridge The Foundation – $61
♣ Living Clean Superstar
Overall Rating: (5 / 5)
Performance Rating: (5 / 5)
Ingredients Rating: (4 / 5)
Lisa Irritation Level: None
Processed Fragrance: None
Silicone Level: High
Coverage Level: Medium
The description of this product reads, “This intelligently formulated, skin friendly foundation has a customisable medium coverage that can be dialled up or down. Self setting, it blends effortlessly to smooth and unify skin with a noticeable soft focus effect. The formula contains a natural mesh-like ingredient which completely fuses with skin after blending. The final finish is neither dewy or flat matte but something skin-like and in between. This Cruelty Free product is Vegan and free from Alcohol, Parabens, Talc, Fragrance, Essential Oils, Nylon 12, Micro Plastics, SPF, D6 and D5.”
Copy goes here
Size: 1 oz.
Credo Clean: Meets Criteria
Clean at Sephora: Meets Criteria
Drunk Elephant Clean: No
EU Compliant: Meets Criteria
EWG Ingredients Rating: 4 (yellow)
EWG Problem Ingredients: Dimethicone (3), PEG-10 Dimethicone (3), Phenoxyethanol (4), Titanium dioxide (3). (Also contains Methyl Trimethicone, Trimethylsiloxysilicate, Diphenyl Dimethicone/Vinyl Diphenyl Dimethicone/Silsesquioxane Crosspolymer, Sorbitan Sesquiisostearate, Triethoxycaprylylsilane.)
Fragrance Ingredients: Caesalpinia Spinosa Fruit Extract, Tropaeolum Majus Flower/Leaf/Stem Extract, Camellia sinensis leaf extract.
All Ingredients: Water, Dimethicone, Methyl Trimethicone, Trimethylsiloxysilicate, Diphenyl Dimethicone/Vinyl Diphenyl Dimethicone/Silsesquioxane Crosspolymer, Propanediol, PEG-10 Dimethicone, Silica, Glycerin, Butylene Glycol, Mica, Phenoxyethanol, Disteardimonium Hectorite, Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Bambusa Arundinacea Stem Extract, Sodium Chloride, Sorbitan Sesquiisostearate, Hydrogenated Lecithin, Ethylhexylglycerin, Titanium Dioxide, Caesalpinia Spinosa Fruit Extract, Tropaeolum Majus Flower/Leaf/Stem Extract, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Alumina, Magnesium Oxide, Kappaphycus Alvarezii Extract, Methicone, Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract. May Contain: Iron Oxides
MAC Studio Radiance Face and Body – $39
Overall Rating: (4 / 5)
Performance Rating: (5 / 5)
Ingredients Rating: (2 / 5)
Lisa Irritation Level: None
Processed Fragrance: Fusanus Spicatus Wood Oil, Orange Oil
Silicone Level: High
Coverage Level: Light/Medium
This foundation is described on the MAC website as “an ultra-light, waterproof foundation that provides a sheer buildable veil of coverage with a natural, radiant glow.”
Because it does not contain sunscreen, I decided to give it a try even though EWG lists a number of ingredients that I feared might be problematic for me.
The MAC counter makeup artist applied the foundation over MAC primer on one side of my face and straight onto my skin on the other side.
I thought that the makeup performed really well on both sides of my face, without causing any noticeable irritation at all.
In addition, I thought the product was really pretty on my skin. It did not seem to emphasize my wrinkles or make me look older, and I don’t think that it was obvious to others that I was wearing any foundation at all.
By the end of the day, the foundation seemed to be going strong. In fact, it adhered so well to my skin that I had to make a special effort to use a few different kinds of makeup removers (in addition to my usual cleansing cream and warm water) before I felt that it was removed from my skin.
Personally, I’m not really looking for makeup to adhere to my skin quite so tightly, and so I doubt I would wear this product too often if I bought it.
I do think that the makeup looks very nice on me and holds up very well, though.
Problematic ingredients in this product include talc (not stated as being tested for asbestos), triethanolamine (a surfactant associated with immunotoxicity), phenoxyethanol and chlorphenesin (preservatives), polysorbate-20 (a surfactant that is on Credo’s “dirty list”), farnesol (a processed fragrance usually derived from the acacia tree), and orange oil.
The product is available in 30 shades.
The makeup artist chose the shade N-0 (the lightest neutral shade) for me and then suggested C-1 (the second-lightest warm shade) as an option. I thought that both of these looked okay on my skin.
Note that the MAC lettering system (for cool/neutral/warm colors) seems totally screwy to me and that visiting a MAC counter or store to get shade-matched may be especially worthwhile.
Size: 1.7 oz.
Ulta Rating: 4.0 Stars (190 reviews)
Credo Clean: No
Clean at Sephora: No
Drunk Elephant Clean: No
EU Compliant: Unclear
EWG Ingredient Rating: 6 (yellow)
EWG Problem Ingredients: Dimethicone (3), Talc (5), Tocopheryl acetate (3), Orange oil (5), Triethanolamine (5), Polysorbate-20 (3), Farnesol (4), Phenoxyethanol (4), Chlorphenesin (3), Titanium dioxide (3). (Also contains Phenyl Trimethicone, Trimethylsiloxysilicate, and Fusanus Spicatus Wood Oil.)
Fragrance Ingredients: Fusanus Spicatus Wood Oil, Orange Peel Oil
All Ingredients: Water, Dimethicone, Hydrogenated Polyisobutene, Butylene Glycol, Vp/Hexadecene Copolymer, Stearic Acid, Phenyl Trimethicone, Polyglyceryl-3 Diisostearate, Ethylhexyl Hydroxystearate, Vp/Eicosene Copolymer, Talc, Trimethylsiloxysilicate, Tocopherol, Tocopheryl Acetate, Fusanus Spicatus Wood Oil, Orange Peel Oil, Magnesium Aluminum Silicate, Triethanolamine, Polysorbate 20, Xanthan Gum, Cetyl Alcohol, Farnesol, Disodium Edta, Phenoxyethanol, Chlorphenesin,. May Contain: Mica, Titanium Dioxide, Iron Oxides.
Mineral Fusion Liquid Foundation – $33
Overall Rating: (3 / 5)
Performance Rating: (3 / 5)
Ingredients Rating: (4 / 5)
Lisa Irritation Level: None
Processed Fragrance: None
Silicone Level: Low
Coverage Level: Full
This product is described on the Mineral Fusion website as follows: “Flawless, full coverage. Mineral Fusion Liquid Foundation gives your skin that I-woke-up-like-this look thanks to its luxe, matte coverage that won’t streak, crease, or look anything but flawless. Age-defying and skin-soothing. Helps encourage firmer, more youthful skin with an antioxidant-rich blend of Green Tea, Pomegranate, Vitamin C, and Peptides. For a skin-soothing touch, Licorice Root, Aloe Vera, and Lavender combine for a seriously calming effect.”
Although this product contains some dimethicone (silicone), it is listed as the eleventh ingredient. Some preservatives (phenoxyethanol and polysorbate-20) that some people can find irritating also are included.
I did not find that this product irritated my skin at all.
However, I did feel that it made my wrinkles look quite a lot worse and that it was very obvious that I was wearing makeup when I had this foundation on.
The product is also pretty shiny looking, to the point that I would probably want to take that down with some powder if I were going to wear it out.
This is an older formula, and I think that some of the fuller-coverage, cleaner foundations that have been released during the past couple of years provide a much more natural look.
Although the product contains some floral ingredients, I am not noticing any particular floral scent associated with it.
The product is available in 30 shades. I tried the color Warm 2 – Buff and thought that it was a pretty good match.
Size: 1 oz.
Amazon Rating: 4.3 Stars (875 reviews)
Credo Clean: No
Clean at Sephora: Unclear
Drunk Elephant Clean: No
EU Compliant: Meets Criteria
Think Dirty Rating: 3 (green)
EWG Product Rating: EWG Verified
EWG Ingredient Rating: 5 (yellow)
EWG Problem Ingredients: Polysorbate-20 (3), Dimethicone (3), Licorice leaf extract (4), Aloe vera (3), Phenoxyethanol (4)
Fragrance Ingredients: Matricaria flower extract, lavender flower extract, pomegranate extract
All Ingredients: Water, Isopropyl Palmitate, Sorbitan Sesquioleate, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Vegetable Glycerin, Silica, Mica, Cetearyl Alcohol, Potassium Cetyl Phosphate, Polysorbate 20, Dimethicone, Palmitoyl Tripeptide-5, Safflower Seed Oil, Matricaria Flower Extract, Lavender Flower Extract, Olive Leaf Extract, Pomegranate Extract, Rooibos Leaf Extract, Licorice Leaf Extract, Aloe Vera Leaf Juice, Ascorbyl Palmitate, Tocopherol, Green Tea Leaf Extract, Caprylyl Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Hydroxyethylcellulose, Phenoxyethanol.
Neutrogena Sensitive Skin Serum Foundation – $15
Performance Rating: Not Rated
Ingredients Rating: (4 / 5)
Processed Fragrance: None
Silicone Level: High
Coverage Level: Light
The description of this product reads, “Improve the look of skin with Neutrogena Healthy Skin® Sensitive Skin Serum Foundation. Suitable for sensitive skin, this serum-infused foundation doubles as skin care and makeup that provides sheer, natural and buildable coverage. It blurs imperfections and the look of pores and is also designed to minimize the look of fine lines. The color-correcting, healthy glow liquid foundation goes on smoothly, leaving skin feeling soothed while visibly reducing redness. Light, natural and buildable coverage designed to blur imperfections and the look of pores. Designed for sensitive skin with Pro-Vitamin B5 to be equal parts skin care and face makeup. Free of fragrance, dyes, parabens, phthalates, sulfates and alcohol.”
I have not yet tried this product.
Size: 1 oz.
Neutrogena Rating: 4.5 Stars (399 reviews)
Credo Clean: No
Clean at Sephora: Unclear
Drunk Elephant Clean: No
EU Compliant: Unclear
EWG Ingredient Rating: 3 (yellow)
EWG Problem Ingredients: Dimethicone (3), Lauryl Peg 10 Tris(Trimethylsiloxy)Silylethyl Dimethicone (3), Titanium dioxide (3). (Also contains Phenyl trimethicone, Cetyl PEG/PPG-10/1 Dimethicone, Trimethylsiloxysilicate, Diphenylsiloxy Phenyl Trimethicone, Polymethylsilsesquioxane, Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer,
Fragrance Ingredients: None
All Ingredients: Water, Butylene Glycol Dicaprylate/Dicaprate, Dimethicone, Phenyl Trimethicone, Methyl Trimethicone, Glycerin, Lauryl Peg 10 Tris(Trimethylsiloxy)Silylethyl Dimethicone, Pentylene Glycol, Octyldodecyl Stearoyl Stearate, Butylene Glycol, Sodium Chloride, Cetyl PEG/PPG-10/1 Dimethicone, Isododecane, 1,2-Hexanediol, Panthenol, Trimethylsiloxysilicate, Diphenylsiloxy Phenyl Trimethicone, Polymethylsilsesquioxane, Silica, Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Glyceryl Caprylate, Tribehenin, Disteardimonium Hectorite, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Disodium EDTA, Titanium Dioxide, Iron Oxides, Mica
Tarte Sea Hydroflex Serum Foundation – $39
Overall Rating: (4 / 5)
Performance Rating: (5 / 5)
Ingredients Rating: (3 / 5)
Lisa Irritation Level: None
Processed Fragrance: None
Silicone Level: Moderate
Coverage Level: Light/Medium
According to the Tarte website, this product is a serum foundation that “lets the true you shine through. Hydroflex technology moves with your skin so it won’t crease or cake. Medium coverage, featherlight formula for a natural finish that looks and feels like your skin. Super serum complex with eight types of hyaluronic acid promotes better bare skin. Water-based formula applies evenly and effortlessly. Delivers 12-hours hydration, brightens and smooths. Minimizes look of pores, fine lines and wrinkles. Sweat protect complex keeps skin looking fresh. Waterproof, sweatproof and fragrance free. Ideal for normal, dry and combination skin.”
This product is part of the Tarte Sea line.
It contains several different kinds of silicone, in addition to some skincare ingredients.
The product does contain some talc. However, it is also listed as Clean at Sephora, which has a criterion of “Restricted use: Only talc with no detection of asbestos according to the raw material specification can be used.”
The waterproof claim makes it seem similar to the Mac Studio Radiance foundation, and it does perform in a similar way.
I feel like both these products look great on my skin, providing some non-irritating mild coverage without exaggerating my wrinkles or other textural issues.
A downside of the products is that they are rather difficult to remove.
In addition, I would not want to wear these foundations on a regular basis since I think that locking my skin under all that product without letting it breathe is very bad for it.
I might consider it for occasional use if I had more skin issues that I was trying to address, though.
I have the shade 12N (“fair neutral”) in this foundation in a mini version that I purchased for $15. I feel the shade has been okay for me.
I am happy that Tarte offers a way for people to give this foundation a real try at a reasonable price and wish other companies would do this as well.
Size: 1 oz.
Sephora Rating: 4.0 Stars (212 reviews)
Credo Clean: Meets Criteria
Clean at Sephora: Yes
Drunk Elephant Clean: No
EU Compliant: Meets Criteria
EWG Ingredient Rating: 5 (yellow)
EWG Problem Ingredients: Talc (5), Dimethicone (3), Sodium benzoate (3), Tocopheryl acetate (3), Phenoxyethanol (4), Titanium dioxide (3). (Also contains Alcohol denat., Dimethicone/vinyl dimethicone crosspolymer, Dimethicone crosspolymer, Polymethylsilsesquioxane, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Hydrolyzed sodium hyaluronate.)
Fragrance Ingredients: None
All Ingredients: Water, Glycerin, Isododecane, Hydrogenated Polydecene, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Butylene Glycol Dicaprylate/Dicaprate, Talc, Alcohol Denat., Hydrogenated Poly (C6-14 Olefin), Hydrogenated Polyisobutene, Butylene Glycol, Dipropylene Glycol, Nylon-12, Polyglyceryl-4 Diisostearate/Polyhydroxystearate/Sebacate, Vinyl Dimethicone/Methicone Silsesquioxane Crosspolymer, Magnesium Sulfate, Alumina, Silica, Dimethicone, Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Polyglyceryl-3 Oleate, Sorbitan Isostearate, Stearalkonium Hectorite, Diisostearoyl Polyglyceryl-3 Dimer Dilinoleate, Sodium Benzoate, Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Propylene Carbonate, Polymethylsilsesquioxane, Potassium Sorbate, Tocopheryl Acetate, Triethoxycaprylylsilane, Niacinamide, Sargassum Pacificum Thallus Extract, Tocopherol, 1,2-Hexanediol, Hydrolyzed Extensin, Soybean Oil, Phenoxyethanol, Kelp Extract, Sodium Hyaluronate, Pancratium Maritimum Extract, Hydrolyzed Ginseng Saponins, Hydroxypropyltrimonium Hyaluronate, Hydrolyzed Hyaluronic Acid, Sodium Acetylated Hyaluronate, Hyaluronic Acid, Hydrolyzed Sodium Hyaluronate, Sodium Hyaluronate Crosspolymer, Potassium Hyaluronate, Titanium Dioxide, Iron Oxides.
Shopping List
This section lists products that seem that they may have potential and that I am hoping to try in the near future.
Readers are highly encouraged to bring other relevant products that they have tried to my attention so that I can add them to this list.
Chantecaille Future Skin Cushion Skincare Foundation – $130
Huda Beauty GloWish Multidew Vegan Skin Tint Foundation – $37
Jane Iredale Beyond Matte Liquid Foundation – $50
Koh Gen Do Maifanshi Aqua Foundation – $96
Rare Beauty Liquid Touch Weightless Foundation – $29
The Ordinary Coverage Foundation – $8
The Ordinary Serum Foundation – $8
Undone Beauty Unfoundation – $14
Trash Can
Armani Luminous Silk Foundation ($69): I received a sample of this popular and expensive foundation and so gave it a try. I thought that it looked nice on my face (though not any nicer than many of the other foundations that I have tried) but did find that it has caused irritation in the form of itching. I also found the synthetic fragrance used in the product to be unpleasant. EWG gives this foundation an 8 (red), flagging as problematic the cyclopentasiloxane (3), cetyl PEG/PPG-10/1 dimethicone (3), phenoxyethanol (4), PEG-10 dimethicone (3), limonene (5), benzyl salicylate (5), benzyl alcohol (6), linalool (3), isobutane (6), fragrance (8), methylparaben (4), hexyl cinnamal (3), and titanium dioxide (3).
About This Website
The Living Clean in a Dirty World shopping website is designed to provide guidance to those seeking out products that are relatively low in toxicity and that provide generally positive user experiences.
Although the skincare and makeup sections have a particular focus on products appropriate for women who are in their 40’s or beyond, the information provided may be useful for other people as well.
The products are curated by Lisa Petrison, who has been focused on helping people to improve their health by avoiding toxicity since 2008 and who heads the Paradigm Change organization.
Her Living Clean in a Dirty World blog site discusses a variety of topics of relevance to those who are working to pursue a more natural lifestyle with less exposure to harmful toxicity.
Lisa is the author of several books, including A Beginner’s Guide to Mold Avoidance (co-written with Erik Johnson).
She also runs the Paradigm Change website (focusing on issues related to toxic mold illness) and the Mold Avoiders Facebook group (designed for the discussion of all topics of interest to those pursuing the mold avoidance approach described in the “Beginner’s Guide” book).
Lisa was born in August 1964 and has yet to try cosmetic surgery, Botox or other cosmetic treatments requiring interactions with a physician, or beauty products containing retinoids.
In her former life, Lisa worked as a business school professor, as a marketing consultant to a variety of large companies, and as a reporter covering the advertising industry.
She holds a Ph.D. in marketing and social psychology from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University as well as B.S./M.S. degrees from the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern.
Lisa would like to extend a special note of appreciation to Ellen Kleiman-Redden for her help in trying out products and discussing issues related to this project.
She also would like to thank the many members of the Mold Avoiders community who have shared suggestions of products to be included here.
A Note From Lisa
Products that I have tried or researched and that I have not found to be acceptable from a toxicity standpoint have been omitted entirely from the discussions on this website.
However, since a goal of this project is to introduce people to a range of options in terms of price and functionality, some products discussed on this site include ingredients that may not be appropriate for everyone.
It’s my hope that all individuals making their way to this site will find at least a few options from each product category that meet all of their own needs and wants from a variety of perspectives.
The vast majority of cosmetics marketers now offer affiliate programs in which Internet content creators may earn commissions if people who are referred to the companies’ sites by clicking on links end up making purchases.
I participate in quite a few individual affiliate programs as well as in the Sovrn/Viglinks program (which automatically converts regular links into revenue-generating links).
Links on this page that may result in affiliate income may include – but are not necessarily limited to – those from the following companies: Amazon, Aveda, Beautycounter, Chantecaille, Charlotte Tilbury, Credo, Fenty, Glossier, Huda, Ilia, Jane Iredale, Koh Gen Do, MAC, Mineral Fusion, Neutrogena, Pharmaca, Rare Beauty, Sephora, Tarte, The Ordinary, Ulta, and Undone Beauty.
Reader comments about products discussed on this website are very welcome.
Thoughts may be shared either by posting them in the comments section at the bottom of this page or by sending them directly to me at the following email address:
info at paradigmchange dot me
Companies that would like to offer me complimentary products to try out may contact me at this address as well.
Individuals who are seeking out less-toxic products or who are interested in pursuing a cleaner and healthier lifestyle may want to sign up to receive occasional email newsletters from Living Clean in a Dirty World.
Those signing up will receive a free PDF copy of the book Back From The Edge (describing the extraordinary life of mold avoidance pioneer Erik Johnson) and also will be automatically entered in sweepstakes giving away a variety of cleaner products.
Thanks very much for visiting the Living Clean in a Dirty World shopping site!
Links on this page are in orange (no underlining).
